[romwell]

Can't wait to see what the almighty AI thinks about the Tits problem![1]

Or the Tits group[2] (I swear, I'm not a member!).

Very tempted to include Tits Alternative[3] as one of my interests on LinkedIn, but I'm afraid the result will be too predictable.

Side note: The two groups that don't satisfy the Tits Alternative are very dear to my heart. Writing software to do computation in Thompson's Group and its generalizations[4] was my introduction to geometric group theory. And I ended up with Grigorchuk as my graduate advisor after learning about the Grigorchuk group.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kneser%E2%80%93Tits_conjecture

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tits_group

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tits_alternative

[4] https://github.com/romwell/nvTrees

[deskr]

Or copper nanotubes. The classic nanotubes are made from carbon (C), called CNTs. The copper (Cu) are called CuNTs.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11433-013-5387-8

[082349872349872]

Or the lazy/eager divide in theoretical computer science: it's difficult to study without a close investigation of topless models' bottoms.