Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by teo_zero 639 days ago
Apart from personal opinions, is there any evidence this is due to Google sabotaging uBlock rather than a legitimate technical concern (V2 vs V3 manifest)?

Could uBlock implement V3 without losing its functionality?

4 comments

> Apart from personal opinions, is there any evidence this is due to Google sabotaging uBlock rather than a legitimate technical concern (V2 vs V3 manifest)?

Google is an ads company. uBlock Origin is making them lose money...

> Could uBlock implement V3 without losing its functionality?

No, that's why everyone is angry and a ton of people switching to Firefox, to keep using uBlock Origin as it is, since Firefox still respects the V2.

> Could uBlock implement V3 without losing its functionality?

no. V3 has some limitations on how many urls gets blocked, and has to be submitted ahead of time iirc.

It is high time the tech commmunity strongly encourage their friends and family to switch to firefox enmass.

> Could uBlock implement V3 without losing its functionality?

Yes, with some minor caveats. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin-lite/...

There is no technical improvement of V3. It is simply about shifting common capabilities of browsers away from you (aka the security threat) towards Google (that is an ultra safe ad supplier).

And this is part of it. Maybe releasing manifest v4 with prominent forks would lessen this purely marketing move by Google.