Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nandhinianand 636 days ago
And for round two went with a lesswrong sequences.. Here's the source

https://www.lesswrong.com/s/gFvira6tHpLXnqCLH/p/TGux5Fhcd7Gm...

and here's the output

>output

TL;DR: People reject new ideas for irrational reasons, not just lack of credentials. Asking "Is that your true rejection?" can help, but be careful not to psychoanalyze.

1 comments

Round 3:(and last round)

This time picked up one of PG's essays.... this one ..

https://paulgraham.com/disagree.html

>output

TL;DR:

1. Name-calling is weak. 2. Ad hominem attacks are weak. 3. Criticizing tone is weak. 4. Contradiction needs evidence. 5. Counterargument can be convincing. 6. Refutation is strongest, refute the central point. 7. Classifying disagreement helps identify dishonest arguments. 8. Being less mean makes people happier.