[swatcoder]

That sounds compelling when you borrow the marketing term "AI" and position the work as part of a sweeping revolution into some beautiful sci-fi future.

It's less compelling when you see the technology as noisy content generators that will flood the network with spam and devour the livelihood and opportunity to learn for low-market artists and programmers.

In the former perspective, you may look at this is "well, what's the best way we can make this happen?" while the latter sees it more like "So you insist on making this happen. Are you sure there's a suitably responsible way for you to do that?"