|
|
|
|
|
by lewhoo
639 days ago
|
|
This is truly the new model's answer ? It's pretty similar to 3.5's "reasoning" actually: In this context, "3.10" and "3.11" should be interpreted as decimal numbers, not as numbers with more digits. When comparing: 3.9
3.10 (which is equal to 3.1)
3.11 (which is equal to 3.11)
We have: 3.9 is greater than 3.1 (3.10), because 9 is larger than 1.
3.11 is greater than 3.9, because 11 is larger than 9.
Thus, 3.11 is the largest of the three numbers. |
|