[margorczynski]

But also on the other hand you'll need much less people to achieve the same effect. Effectively a whole team could be replaced by one lead guy that just based on the requirements orders the LLM what to do and glues it together.

[baq]

Yes - my point is: be that guy

[grugagag]

First many people can be that guy? If that is 5% that means 95% of the rest should go.

Second, just because a good engineer can have much higher throughput of work, multiplied by AI tools, we know the AI output is not reliable and needs a second look by humans. Will those 5% be able to stay on top of it? And keep their sanity at the same time?

[baq]

Do not assume constant demand. There are whole classes of projects which become feasible if they cash be made 10x faster/cheaper.

As for maintaining sanity… I’m cautiously optimistic that future models will continue to get better. Very cautiously. But cursor with Claude slaps and I’m not getting crazy, I actually enjoy the thing figuring out my next actions and just suggesting them.