|
|
|
|
|
by theultdev
651 days ago
|
|
> Emotional outbursts (like being startled/angered/in pain) may be temporarily irrational your own logic-wise, but your regular emotional background absolutely reflects what you actually believe is happening and the way you think. Yes your emotional background reflects what you believe is happening, but you can correct your belief if you analyze and rationalize the emotional response when you feel it, which then updates your emotional background. > So unless you’re doing emotional logging and are really managing your beliefs, deep settings, etc afterwards, this is simply impossible. That's exactly what I'm suggesting you do. Upon receiving every major emotional reaction you make it a habit to analyze it immediately afterwards. |
|
Either we talk about different things here, or I lack some Sherlock Holmes level skills that you have.
Anyway, if something bothers me that hard, making it unbother me is an improvement to work in a stupid situation, not self-normalization.
For example, recently I got frustrated when an inexperienced relative wrongly measured airport hand baggage (pure geometric cluelessness) and insisted airport will do it that way too. I find this frustration absolutely normal and don’t really want to get rid of it, cause it’s immediately actionable and the response is correct-ish.
Otoh, I successfully defeated my non-actionable fear of being late, but it took me a couple of advanced techniques I didn’t even know existed, some movie-level talk to your childhood stuff.
So there’s so much to it that I just don’t see how to “just do afterwards” (at least it sounds like that).
Again, feels we are talking different things here, not sure. And sorry for the stream of consciousness.