|
|
|
|
|
by Terr_
647 days ago
|
|
Or at any rate, "as one member, we ended up spending more when we started participating in a thingy" isn't super-strong evidence that the thingy is OK. __________ To illustrate this, imagine some kind of over-the-top incontrovertible conspiracy to depress wages. I'm talking a secret volcano-island base, a letterhead with a Et redigam operarios in servitutem in latin, members greeting each-other as "Hello, fellow conspirator!" while twirling deliberate Snidely Whiplash mustaches, etc. Then a new company joins the cartel, and it turns out that company was one of the ones previously paying below the fixed-price. The fact that some members pay more on joining doesn't change the core nature of the system, especially if there's "noise" in the organic prices. |
|