|
|
|
|
|
by GaggiX
649 days ago
|
|
There are much newer papers shown than "Attention is All You Need" (all of them?) and much less talked about (probably all of them, too). It shouldn't be surprising that a LLM is able to understand a paper, just upload one to Claude 3.5 Sonnet. |
|
For all the other papers, assuming they were impactful, they must have been referred by others, highlighting what their contribution is, what is controversial, etc.
In other words: the LLM doesn't have to "understand" the paper; it can simply parrot what others have been saying/writing about it.
(For example: a podcast about Google Illuminate could use our brief exchange to discuss the possible merits of this technology.)