Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hi-v-rocknroll 652 days ago
There are multiple matters being conflated together.

0. Tempering customer expectations from overpromising.

1. Investors' concerns about liabilities of advertising autonomous operation, potentially implicitly implying unsupervised.

2. Culpability of drivers when "supervised" (within visual sight) operation fails in a manner that's not immediately physically controllable. What if summon runs into a person or runs over a pet?

3. Potentially replacing "original FSD" with a lower tier substitute at the same price point, or as a subscription only.

While I might jump to 3, 0 and 1 seem the most likely. 2 is still remains a big question mark.