|
|
|
|
|
by threecheese
645 days ago
|
|
Because 1) the .git directory was deployed with the app code (the exploit vector), and 2) the deployment pipeline automatically integrated and pushed the attacker’s commit to a production system (completing the exploit), I’d say that claim is accurate. These are both defects in the thing the attacker claims to have exploited. It sure wasn’t a good decision to use git-config to store creds for CI though! I wonder if OP found a developer’s old cached creds in the history that weren’t used anymore but happened to still be valid? |
|