|
|
|
|
|
by josefritzishere
644 days ago
|
|
This reads like a propadanda peice focusing on zoning (which is relevant) but disregards the recent supply-side affects of private equity companies moving hard into real estate. They will point to the fact that they only own 2% of homes overall, but they purchased 24% of sold inventory in 2022 and 40% in 2023. That is huge. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/mar/15/in-shift-44... |
|
“When combining closings between both larger, private equity and smaller, independent operations, investors accounted for 44% of the purchases of flips during the third quarter, the data reveals.” https://www.businessinsider.com/big-investors-purchasing-mor...
The impact of investors on the larger market is much less clear: https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2024/rise-in-investor...
I found the original submission worthwhile because it moves beyond these sorts of discussions. I didn't view it as focusing on zoning, but on highlighting how our local democratic structures themselves contribute to these issues. It has implications that go beyond just housing.