|
|
|
|
|
|
by tomtom1337
644 days ago
|
|
|
As an aside to the topic, that's not quite how the maths would work. If the panels were 100% more efficient, you wouldn't need 100% less of them If the panels were 20% more efficient, you'd want 1 -1/1.20 = 16.7% less of them. |
|
|