|
|
|
|
|
by vidarh
644 days ago
|
|
Thanks. I remember looking at Litepub. Not aware of the other two. The FeatherPub document feels like by far the most useful. But I also think just going through the spec with a red marker would be a useful exercise and maybe I will one day. In the sense that there are a whole lot of features nobody does anything useful with. E.g. "@context" in theory provides a whole lot of ways to type the rest of the data. I'd be willing to bet that you'd break a whole lot of software if you served up a "@context" for an actor that mapped common field-names in use by Mastodon to a different namespace and mapped the Mastodon features to different names... In theory it's great. In practice, I suspect we have XML namespaces and people stupidly hardcoding prefixes all over again... |
|