| > This is not a "user-friendliness" issue by it's very definition. The OP is not even a user! They don't need an account to be a user, as you seem to acknowledge later in your comment: "The naivety to believe the lack of a Github account somehow safeguards your browsing data" > Perhaps you didn't read the conversation. The parent literally made the argument that Microsoft (ignoring that Github is a separate company) has plenty of money and therefore should provide this service for free even to non-users. They said "one of the most successful companies in human history". That has nothing to do with the parent's amount of money. It's not a human-comparable amount of money. If the company had ten million dollars the parent wouldn't be making the same argument about size. > This entire thread is pure insanity. Life doesn't need to be this difficult people. Create a throwaway account if you are so worried... or find some other service. You are not owed anything by Github - yet despite that they have made it trivially easy to benefit from their services at no cost to you. I have an account. That doesn't change how companies should work. And I find no "difficulty" in having a little discussion. > You are not owed anything Yeah I am. They make mass market money and they use public infrastructure. If the population wants to impose rules on them, the population gets to. Like forcing them to pay taxes. That's money they owe me indirectly. I don't get to make the decisions on my own, but I can say if I think a theoretical rule would be good. |