|
>Well, you see, I've been a professional developer for the last 45 years, and often, gasp, think for long periods of time before coding, or even writing things down. "Look ma, no hands!". >I know this will come across as an excuse, but the thing is I assumed you were also vaguely famililar with things like software development, or other cases where human's think before acting, so I evidentially did a poor job of convincing you of this. Really, you have the same train of thought for hours on end ? When you finish even your supposed hours long spiel, do you just proceed to write every line of code that solves your problem just like that ? Or do you write and think some more ? More importantly, are LLMs unable to produce the kind of code humans spend a train of thought on ? >Maybe drop Yan LeCun a note too - tell him that the Turing Award committee are asshats, and that he is too, and that LLMs will get us all the way to AGI. You know, the appeal to authority fallacy is shifty at the best of times but it's straight up nonsensical when said authority does not have consensus on what you're appealing to. Like great you mentioned LeCun. And I can just as easily bring in Hinton, Norvig, Ilya. Now what ? |
Write them too - spread the news of your "increase N" innovation ?
Don't scare Hinton too much though - just suggest a small increase in N.