|
|
|
|
|
by sparknlaunch
5107 days ago
|
|
In a recent fictional book about poverty in the UK, two types if poverty were identified. One was unintentional poverty- someone falls into trouble due to no fault of their own. Maybe illness, trauma etc The other is intentional- individuals taking full advantage of government benefits. In the UK generations of families have been stuck in this category. One group feel more deserving... |
|
The UK tax and benefits system creates perverse incentives. The systems are baffling (advisors for tax or for benefits need a lot of training (accountants need degree level studying and qualifications)) and interlocking. They are handled by different government departments. Mistakes are common. If the people paying the benefit make a mistake to your detriment nothing happens. (Or if you make a mistake to your detriment.) (And if you don't notice in time you're unlikely to get that money ever.) But if they make a mistake in your favour that money will be clawed back, no matter how long ago the mistake was made. And if you make a mistake in your favour, or if you don't report their mistakes in your favour, you risk interview under caution, arrest, and prosecution.
Compare this treatment of people who are poor with, for example, very wealthy companies taking extreme borderline legal tax avoidance measures.
People who have learned dependence might not feel deserving, but getting them off benefit and into work isn't as easy as clubbing them with punishments. Especially since it was society that put them there.
Here's an example of Vodafone:
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/oct/22/vodafone...)
They owed maybe £6bn, probably £4bn. They paid £1.2bn in a deal.