|
|
|
|
|
by starspangled
653 days ago
|
|
If a company requires a continued or guaranteed supply of a product or service with only a single provider, they need to sign longer term contracts, accept the risk that conditions will change, or develop alternative plans. I find it extremely hard to have any sympathy for AT&T over "vendor lock-in" (aka signing short-term contracts for a single-source products and making their business critically depend on it). Don't view this through the lens of the common person or small business who absolutely do need particular protections and consideration under the law. That's because people have an extreme disadvantage in negotiating power in many markets, and don't have millions of dollars to spend on lawyers and analysts. |
|