|
|
|
|
|
by eddd-ddde
645 days ago
|
|
Maybe, but what's the point ? If science improves shouldn't we aim for less population? Less people can keep up with more production. Less people means less impact on the environment. Less people means more nature. At least personally I rather have less people on the planet at any given moment. |
|
Sure I want less people and more earth to myself too, but if everyone [overall] wants as many free kids as they can afford, how on earth are you going to end up with having less people?
A girl's maximum happiness is directly correlated with the number of children she has. regardless of how much free capital and brainwashing received