[Joel_Mckay]

It is an internal metric from a College that offers kids GED/remedial-high-school-level math prep classes for remote students. There are various reasons a student may be unable to physically attend classes, and remote 1-on-1 instruction is not in the budgets. The rate for curriculum completion is a very low 1:17 for self-directed study.

The learning outcomes for students are often terrible for this path, but perhaps good if you charge for the tutorial service I guess. Attrition rates are not something institutions proudly promote in public.

YC seems to down-vote anything that deals with a data-driven reality. lol =3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYh7smM6YpM

[sayonidroy]

Interesting points. but not very student can afford or has access to group studies or human tutors right?

[Joel_Mckay]

In my country it is the law, that the state must educate you to at least high-school level free of charge. Regardless of the challenges one may face along the way (protects those who are autistic, blind, deaf, poor, paralyzed, or incarcerated etc.)

In introductory and undergraduate academics, the departments will usually offer unstructured TA lab hours for those who seek additional help understanding material. However, the reality is "A" level students do not require good teachers, as their grades are usually not correlated with instructor proficiency (often due to a 3 year head start from out-of-band after-school tutoring services prior to the conclusion of grade school.)

The danger from LLM contaminating long-term memory recall from an erroneous primacy effect is a concern.

Have a nice day, =3