[diggan]

> Horizon Europe

For people who are unaware, Horizon Europe is a research initiative that spans a wide range of interests, from nuclear energy to basically anything else, with the fine restriction that all research has to be open and public.

https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding...

I'm not sure what the "dunk" is supposed to mean here, are you saying funding research like this is a waste of taxpayers money?

[raverbashing]

People who dunk on public projects usually are unaware of all the research their own government finances

[Delk]

The same people might also dunk on public projects funded by their own governments.

But I think they may not be quite aware of:

1. How many present-day things we take for granted have been enabled by basic research, sometimes on weird or unimportant-sounding topics.

2. How basic research can't necessarily quite go only for "important" and big results and skip the "unimportant" results and topics, or know in advance which ones are going to be useful and which ones aren't.

3. How investments in fundamental research are, proportionally speaking, actually quite small. The 100 billion euros for Horizon Europe sounds like a lot, but that spans over seven years (2021 to 2027), and if it's funding a crapton of all kinds of research, there are also almost certainly going to be lots of results that are going to be useful. And, granted, also lots of ones that won't be, at least not directly. But even the vast majority of the useful ones are going to fly under the radar for just about everyone outside of the particular field so it's easy to not be aware of them (see also points 1 and 2).

The EU has a population of ~450 million. The 100B euros over 7 years means the costs are ~225 euros per EU resident in total, or ~32 euros per year. I'm almost certainly paying more than the average EU resident, so let's say I'm paying 70 euros per year for the whole deal.

I don't really have a huge problem with that. If it were for some kind of a small or narrow range of projects, I might. But it's not.

[bigfishrunning]

Or, it's possible, they are aware and don't support it. I don't think "My government is better then yours" was the goal here...

[matly]

Agreed!

I really enjoy seeing stuff like Horizon. There are so many bad examples for taxpayers money (e.g. Gaia-X), but Horizon ain't that.

[octocop]

I think projects this magnitude are not good, with a 100B euro pricetag that will be diluted into paying for bureaucracy and conferences. It's good that it's keeping people busy though, can't criticise that.

[diggan]

Just so others get a sense of the scale involved here:

Currently the portal (CORDIS) has 13674 projects listed as part of Horizon Europe[0]. 100B eur would on average be ~73K EUR per project.

While Horizon Europe itself is a huge project, the projects funded from it isn't always huge projects but sometimes small, incremental steps towards something, and sometimes larger projects.

But with a perspective on how many projects are within the framework, 100B doesn't sound so much anymore.

- [0] https://cordis.europa.eu/search?q=contenttype%3D%27project%2...

[octocop]

You think 100B doesn't sound much? Do you want to up the numbers to 200B instead? I mean after all it's Cancer research

[diggan]

> You think 100B doesn't sound much?

I think "~73K EUR per project" doesn't sound much, and I'd happily pay more taxes if I could be sure research would receive more of my taxes.

[octocop]

I mean look at this project, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101183057 "A digital twin of human milk". Sounds like a homerun right? I'd say 80% of the projects are just filled with buzzwords to get funding, and they rarely produce any good outcomes

[diggan]

> The research and innovation program, named GALATEA, stands as a pioneering venture targeting infant nutrition through the development of a digital twin of human milk.

> The overarching objective is to create a sophisticated simulation platform that mirrors the intricate composition of human milk, allowing for the formulation of personalized nutrition plans for infants, particularly those born prematurely.

> Anticipated outcomes include enhanced health outcomes for newborns, a deeper understanding of human milk for the advancement of artificial milk formulations, and the establishment of a robust research community dedicated to neonatal nutrition.

I mean, the ideal outcomes sound pretty good. And the non-ideal outcome is we learnt about a bunch of stuff that doesn't work, that's how research works after all.

What, exactly, is your critique about that particular research? That they call it a "digital twin", or what?

[lagadu]

> rarely produce any good outcomes

That's the nature of research.

[seabass-labrax]

> The overarching objective is to create a sophisticated simulation platform that mirrors the intricate composition of human milk, allowing for the formulation of personalized nutrition plans for infants, particularly those born prematurely.

I don't see any buzzwords there; simulation is an indispensable tool modern for biochemistry.

If you stopped reading at the (admittedly daft) acronym, it's worth keeping in mind that, outside computer circles, 'digital twin' now refers to any kind of simulation or tracking of a physical resource. This is not some nebulous proposal for a blockchain NFT of human milk, it's genuine scientific research.

[r00fus]

In the US we spend 10x that on military expenditures that have marginal benefit to our own society.

I think the EU model is preferable.

[phatfish]

It's not a monolithic project, it's a funding pool where an organisation can apply for access. It's not even limited to EU member states, the UK has returned as a partner after the Conservative party got their panties in a twist about it during Brexit.

[diggan]

And latest news is that Canada also joined up :)

> Canada is joining the growing group of non-EU countries who have associated to the EU's research and innovation programme, Horizon Europe, and will work jointly on large-scale projects tackling our biggest challenges.

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_24_...

The more the merrier!

[hallux]

There is, of course, the possibility that he was being sarcastic.

[phatfish]

With the prevalence of uniformed opinions about the EU and how it works on HN, that is a long shot (or big reach as the kids say).

[diggan]

Yeah, I suppose, but "EU throws tax payer money in the sea" and "EU stifles innovation with regulation" are so common sentiments around these parts that I'm unsure if it's sarcasm or not, 50/50 at this point.

[octocop]

I wasn't.