|
|
|
|
|
by _heimdall
655 days ago
|
|
I do personally disagree with this definition. Free speech was always intended to protect the right to say whatever you want. The expansion of what falls under free speech is dangerous and, as made clear today, leads to arguments that erode what was originally meant to be a fundamental right. |
|
Who intended that?
So you have no problem with defamation? Or threats?