|
|
|
|
|
by yadaeno
650 days ago
|
|
We’re talking about xx million dollar dispute between allied countries, it’s not a reasonable method of conflict resolution to start throwing people in cages that work for x company until the EU gets their way. > what do you mean “did not commit” It’s standard around the world that employees are not held personally responsible for the crimes of the corporation they work for. Edit: if we’re talking about an individual US citizen that’s found guilty in the EU, then the EU will go through the extradition process to have them arrested. |
|
> It’s standard around the world that employees are not held personally responsible for the crimes of the corporation they work for.
Is it really so simple? Is all that the cartels missing to avoid persecution from the US gov't simply incorporating in their home state? Of course not.
Imagine that offered death by drones. You tell 'em who you want killed and they mail a package containing a drone that pops out and kills the person when it's delivered. Would it be reasonable to say "Yeah we can't arrest anyone from that company when they come to our country because they incorporated in another jurisdiction?"