[kelsey98765431]

This is how busybox works in 'shim' mode. I am not however concerned with the security argument here, if you have the ability to run code you have the ability to do n to the power of x insidious things, and arg[0] abuse is just one of dozens, (hundreds?) of vectors or useful building blocks in an attack. if we are suddenly giving a shit about security on nixens, we should be looking at deeper SELinux rollouts (ease of use for sysadmins and maintainers so we never see permissive mode instead of just applying the difficult to remember command that will patch your policy settings. We need root capabilities to continue to be separated in the kernel access control scheme and probably we need to start using namespaces much more liberally like projects like silverblue/bluefin which reimplement entire os stack as a series of containers. Stronger container foundations and ease of use for existing security mechanisms will take us much further than worrying about ANYTHING else in the ABI which by the way will never change as long as linus is alive, and he will live on forever as an LLM most likely with the amount of mailing list posts he has made over the years.