[buremba]

Do you support scaling to zero? I wonder if native offerings of cloud providers (Cloud SQL/Alloydb or Aurora) still make sense as keeping hundreds of PG instances at scale will likely be a challenge if you're managing them from your control plane.

Also, is there any compliance that requires it to be in different Postgresql servers? I assume most companies just use some sort of isolation (tenant_id column or dedicated tenant database/table) so I wonder if this problem could better be solved as a proxy layer.

[willothy]

We support scaling to near-zero because of Aurora serverless, but we definitely are looking into other solutions that could be cheaper to run or self-hosted.

Some regional regulations (GDPR, etc.) require local and/or isolated hosting. Most companies indeed solve this with either a tenant id column, dedicated tenant databases or both. We want to simplify those architectures, and a proxy layer is exactly our idea there - we're working on a solution that handles connection pooling and routing to remove the need to cache connections on the client.