|
|
|
|
|
by bubblesnort
661 days ago
|
|
This is of course a slippery slope argument, but not neccesarily wrong: I think systemd is moving a FLOSS operating system towards one that has source but comes in binaries. You get an initrd that's not built by you, tucked in a kernel also not built by you, runs the userspace from an immutable image also not built by you, which can be updated with binary deltas also not built by you, etc... This makes sense from the perspective of making a kitchen appliance for the home consumer market. It makes no sense at all from the perspective of making a Unix-like operating system with four freedoms from scratch and ensure it stays that way. |
|
Your freedom to tinker is not in conflict with my need to stay secure; in fact, when you're finally done with your tinkering, you too may appreciate the feeling of your data being secure against the most basic/common threats.
(I'm rarely in agreement with Poettering, but he's 100% on point here.)