[thro1]

But.. isn't true that some Intel SSD Hardware Encryption is not (known to be) broken so far (unlike Samsung, WD, Crucial etc.)?

( https://www.tomshardware.com/news/crucial-samsung-ssd-encryp... https://community.wd.com/t/what-do-you-think-of-the-security... https://www.zdnet.com/article/flaws-in-self-encrypting-ssds-... https://techreport.com/news/256-bit-aes-encryption-broken-in... https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/134564/how-secu... and some Defcon(?) files I can't find now - no success with Intel ? )

[BodyCulture]

Have you been able to do a review of the code?

If yes: please share.

If not: why not?

Thanks!

[thro1]

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18385507 ?

[fsflover]

https://www.kicksecure.com/wiki/Malware_and_Firmware_Trojans...

[thro1]

(THAT, cite of tptacek, fulfilling someone's request, downvoted - with.. such empty*, hypothetical argument ?? - so far it's a libel - at least make some effort to proof otherwise in that case Mr FSFdiscreditor..

*"easier to hide backdoors" - so you don't need source to check the _real_ code - only more effort)

-

vs attack surface ? (having no reasons for powerful adversaries)