[fn-mote]

Agreed - it's like they transplanted the "found in a rigorous math class" definition of a determinant. That's the one where the desired properties are the assumption and then you show that your preferred mechanical method of computation gives those properties. Usually there's a final step where you show the properties are enough to establish uniquemess.

None of those mathy steps occur in this book. There are just statements in boxes like "remember: all methods of computing the determinant give the same answer".

Honestly, looking at that section I'm having a hard time understanding how they justify the name "interactive linear algebra". The extent of my interactions is clicking on the arrow to expose the example.

The graphics are fine, but they aren't interactive like it says on the cover.

I do respect this, a lot:

> This textbook is exclusively targeted at Math 1553 at Georgia Tech. As such, it contains exactly the material that is taught in that class; no more, and no less: students in Math 1553 are responsible for understanding all visible content.

[lupire]

That's an absolutely terrible goal!

How can you expect someone to learn exactly what you present? No motivation for extension. No context for understanding.

It's supposed to be a textbook, not an exam crib sheet.

The book was meh, but seeing that stated goal frastically lowers my respect for the GA Tech math department. It shows the clear disdain that the professor has for the students and the material they are teaching.

[AlexCornila]

I went there for undergrad and trust me it’s the hunger games. I remember for one class, DSP we would have labs before they would actually teach the material and as a student you were how the Fck can I achieve whatever the lab is asking with the knowledge we learned so far… you couldn’t and it would take a couple of labs to realize that material req was from next class.