|
|
|
|
|
by lpil
662 days ago
|
|
I think you're misunderstanding here. We have very robust mechanisms for dealing with conflict and we have been successfully employing them for years. We have also consulted with moderators of much larger communities and very confident with how it is going. Not sure what you mean about the Elm remark. They took the approach you're advocating for and have seen less success than we have financially and in terms of community growth metrics. |
|
And they didn't take the approach I'm advocating for (though they didn't take yours either). Their conflict management approach was "we do what Evan says". I'm not saying you're making their mistakes, I'm offering them as a cautionary tale—language success can be fleeting.
> We have very robust mechanisms for dealing with conflict and we have been successfully employing them for years.
If I'm understanding the approach correctly it's basically "we delete it". Feel free to elaborate if that's not what you meant.
[0] https://tjpalmer.github.io/languish/#y=mean&weights=issues%3...