Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by smt88 657 days ago
Calorie restriction is a well-studied (though not terribly healthy) way to slow aging. It's likely these drugs are just making it easier for people.
3 comments

Calories restriction worked in a wide variety of species but was inconclusive in monkeys and was never proven in humans.
I'm not sure what standard you're using for "proven," but there are a lot of studies showing results similar to this one: https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/news/calorie-restricti...

There don't seem to be any huge, long-term studies, but here is a review of what's available as of a few years ago: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468870/

I thought calorie restriction was another order of magnitude, beyond "normal" weight. But I guess if obesity was causing accelerated ageing, you could say not being obese is delaying ageing.
It varies from study to study, but generally what I've seen for anti-aging is ~1,000 calories per day or less. I've seen it as low as 500.
See Roy Walford et al out of UCLA on the CRON diet. Its not a nice way to live, but it seems to be safe and healthy.
I'll have to look into it more, but from what I've seen, it seemed that people had to restrict calories so much that their immune system was underactive (which may be a large part of why it works).
Interesting, i last looked at this over 10 years ago, i assume this came to light more recently than that.