|
|
|
|
|
by jcrawfordor
661 days ago
|
|
The terminology here can be a little confusing, because WoL isn't a precisely standardized term but rather sort of a general label for a family of behaviors, the most common of which is the "Magic Packet" that originated with AMD. For some time a magic packet was mostly the only thing that could wake a computer, because the NIC had to originate a power-on event and most NICs were only capable of doing so in response to a magic packet. There were, though, particularly in more "enterprise" contexts, NICs that could be configured to wake the machine on other types of traffic. This kind of thing went in the option ROM of high-end NICs. Today, though, with various low-power states and "hybrid sleep," packets received while in a low-power state can actually be delivered to the operating system to make a decision on waking. That's made WoL a lot more complex: with a supported network adapter and power state, Windows will wake up in response to pretty much any network traffic directed at the sleeping computer. That detection is surprisingly sophisticated, unicast packets addressed to a computer will wake it, but so will certain recognized discovery protocols sent to broadcast when they specify the computer's hostname. One the one hand, it's pretty neat that e.g. attempting to connect to an SMB share on a Windows computer will wake it. On the other hand, it means that "nuisance" WoL has become an occasional irritation. For that reason you can configure Windows back to the original behavior of only waking on a magic packet specifically. To be fair, the whole idea came about in part because of all the implementation limitations with magic packets that made them very flaky. Microsoft refers to all of this functionality with the term "WoL," while Apple seems to have decided to avoid the confusion by calling the entire concept "Wake on Demand" instead. |
|