[dragonwriter]

> What you misunderstand is what "looks good" means.

No, I don't.

> Before AI, art that looked good was valuable and impressive precisely because few artists could produce it.

I didn't say anything about valuable and impressive, I said "useful". For an analogy, clip art isn't particularly valuable or impressive, but its useful for lots of things. Yes, exchange value is dependent on scarcity, utility is not.