[BanazirGalbasi]

Keeping ctrl-C as the binding for copy is silly though. Intentionally having poor UX that's unnecessarily confusing to power users because of "reasons" is why Windows can never become a credible developer OS.

[Wytwwww]

Having different shortcuts for the same operation in different applications is just wrong.

> Windows can never become a credible developer OS.

For better or for worse it has been one for decades.

> Keeping ctrl-C as the binding for copy is silly though

Why? Also sure whatever, it can be something else as long as it is CONSISTENT.

> confusing to power users

Well.. Good thing is that "power users" know how to change default shortcuts and can use a different "power user" profile.

[pram]

The shortcut is actually the same everywhere: Command+C

You obviously just switched it to mimic Windows, which is why it's "inconsistent"

[Wytwwww]

You mean "Super/Meta + C" is the default for copy on Linux making the whole argument redundant? I don't think that's a default shortcut on Gnome or KDE....