[Gud]

You can’t be so naive that you think this has anything to do with the reasons you listed.

The government in Brazil does not like X because users are critizing the government.

Unfortunately Brazil is barely a democracy and it’s infested with little potentates.

[croes]

Criticizing?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Brazilian_Congress_atta...

It's a bit more, isn't it?

[chipdart]

> The government in Brazil does not like X because users are critizing the government.

This baseless personal assertion does not pass the smell test. I'm going to explain to you why.

Elon Musk's Twitter is happily censoring opposition of totalitarian dictatorships such as Turkey's Erdogan regime, and the only remark that Elon Musk published regarding censoring Turk opposition parties is that Elon Musk's Twitter would risk being removed from Turkey. Elon Musk, when he caved to Erdogan's demands to censor his opposition, famously said

> “Did your brain fall out of your head, Yglesias? The choice is have Twitter throttled in its entirety or limit access to some tweets. Which one do you want?”

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/05/twitter-musk-censors...

So for Turkey's totalitarian dictatorship Elon Musk finds it acceptable to censor opposition by arguing bullshit like "either we show some content or no content", but for Brasil's democratic regime, which barely managed to fend off a fascist military coup, when they request Elon Musk's Twitter to appoint a legal representative to handle requests... That's suddenly unacceptable?

Bullshit.

[fluoridation]

The statement you are replying to is "the government in Brazil does not like X because users are critizing the government." Why are you talking about what Musk did? What does one thing have to do with the other?