[loganfrederick]

Yep, it is definitely worth clarifying that all the code has to be reviewed manually still. An aside is that the LLMs (both Claude and GPT) have common failure modes in using Godot 3 syntax instead of 4, etc.

I meant to make the point that, having worked on mobile game dev recently, if the behavior I'm thinking of seems simple, my workflow instincts have become to go to LLMs first rather than Github. Very possible this is a bad reflex. Just one I've observed directly from my experience implementing similar functionality as the parent library.

It looks like spywaregorilla's comment was downvoted at least once but I think it was making the valid point sarcastically that the idea of "LLM generated code replacing commonly used libraries is a bad one." My original post was positing on whether this might be a future trend though.

Also want to recognize the author of the library (prophesi) commented down below and definitely applaud their work in packaging and open sourcing their work plus making the tutorial video.