[cool_dude85]

>Unfortunately a few years later I can say the opposite.

It's your contention that people getting up in arms about not changing the name of the 'master' branch specifically look good now, with hindsight? Can't say I agree.

[mixmastamyk]

You’ve reframed the disagreement about unnecessary work as “up in arms.” They look like sane folks who recommended not doing purely symbolic work.

Something substantial perhaps, say promoting under-represented folks within psf would be something. You can’t eat branch names.

[zahlman]

For what it's worth, David Mertz would agree with you (https://discuss.python.org/t/why-im-leaving-discuss-python-o...).

He got kicked out, too.

[Izkata]

That the people implying they were monsters were the actual monsters.

[animuchan]

We can mostly agree that the people acting on the irresistible urge to rename git branches specifically look bad now.

Turns out it's a slippery slope, who would've thunk.