>Transit should be free, like sidewalks and parks.
And most similarly, roads. The theoretical 'farebox recovery ratio' of most roads is 0, but this is never part of the conversation. Maybe if it were, transit would look much better in comparison.
NYC has 470 stations, by far the most. Who cares about long-distance stops with nothing in between. NYC has train stations in every single neighborhood in the city.
It's more complicated than that, because some stations with multiple lines get counted multiple times for that. Though even if NYC does have 20 more stations than Shanghai, it's a bit of a stretch to call that "by far". When, again, other cities have twice the tunnel length and nearly twice the ridership.
There are neighborhoods in Queens and Brooklyn where the closest subway station can be miles away, and there is an entire borough in NYC that has no general subway access at all, so not buying that one either.
The difference is that when a sidewalk or park is ruined and un-walkable then it's cheap and easy to just put up some orange cones. So the cost of failure is basically zero.
Not the case with the 4 train, or the L, or the 2-3. Those trains can't fail. So it's very expensive to make sure they don't. Nobody cares if Madison Square Park is blocked off for a day. (Maybe except the vagrants).
But the city will literally grind to a halt if the green or red lines aren't running.
And most similarly, roads. The theoretical 'farebox recovery ratio' of most roads is 0, but this is never part of the conversation. Maybe if it were, transit would look much better in comparison.