Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by scoofy 659 days ago
I prefer the Jimmy Wales version of authority. The project operates democratically, but Jimmy always retains the ultimate authority to act as a sovereign at the end of the day because he built it, has the reputation of the project to protect, and it's his legacy. The option to fork the project will always be there if the people want new leadership.
2 comments
debacle 659 days ago
Guido did that for a long time, but I think he reached a point where he wanted to transition.
link
scoofy 659 days ago
Again, I would prefer he retain an unused veto. Who knows, perhaps he's entirely fine with his comment being removed.

The benefits of a sovereign are that they limit the amount of privileges that can be extracted from an political system. Obviously monarchs have their downsides, but if people can just up and fork the project, those downsides are limited.

link
lazyasciiart 659 days ago
The downsides can be pretty high for the chosen monarch.
link
scoofy 659 days ago
I obviously can't speak to the politics of the Python Foundation (my favorite language and would buy every single person in this governance discussion a beer), but my point is that these types of monarchs generally have more (Taleb-style) skin in the game than someone who shows up later. More to lose (everything they've built), and so I would generally trust their judgement to care more about the institution as a whole, than about exercising power (which is the entire reason they have effectively given up power in the first place).
link
toofy 659 days ago
a wannabe king is more than welcome to fork this project as it sits, right now, today. and they can be as non-democratic as they want with their own little fifedom.
link
FireBeyond 659 days ago
> The project operates democratically

I have not paid attention in years, and with the acknowledgment that some of the contributors there were their own worst enemy and/or not without sin, but you should really poke around http://wikipediareview.com/ - to see just how untrue that often is.

(I'm talking confidential email lists, whose existence is not to be confirmed, IRC channels, brigading, and far worse).

link