[emptysongglass]

I don't think the point is to argue anti-cheat isn't effective, the point is to draw a line in the sand and say, this is where it stops.

Take the analogy of enabling better police work by granting unlimited access to our private communications. No one doubts it would be effective, but the cost and the threat is too much.

This is the line we draw in the sand: get out of the kernel, anti-cheat has no business being there. The cost and threat are too great.

This acceptance is the same situation that brought us the Crowdstrike incident. It's unacceptable.

We fail as an industry and as a society when we accept these compromises.