|
|
|
|
|
by gregjor
655 days ago
|
|
This seems like retaliating against someone who doesn't want to date you after some online chatting. I think you focus on the wrong thing. Ghosting doesn't happen because the recruiter or employer has a problem you need to identify and fix. It happens because you don't stand out enough to get their interest. Recruiters get paid a good commission for making a placement, so it follows they focus their attention on candidates they can place. They don't spend time on candidates who look weak, or just like every other candidate. Sometimes recruiters and employers place ads for jobs they may or may not actually hire for, to fill their database with candidates who might match future job listings. You can't do anything about that -- going through recruiters comes down to part numbers game and part standing out from the crowd. If your job hunting strategy focuses primarily on filling out online applications and responding to jobs listed on LinkedIn and other sites, you already put yourself in the most competitive and least effective game. You should start with personal and professional contacts. You should cultivate real relationships with competent recruiters (you find those through word of mouth). You should find out about the jobs that don't get posted on job boards -- the majority of openings for a lot of fields. Identify a few recruiters who have worked for colleagues and invite them to lunch if you want them to remember you and put you on their short list. Spending your time trying to identify and maybe punish recruiters who ghost you won't help you find a job, which is what I assume you intend to do. Why waste time doing that? |
|
What you're saying is correct. Obviously you should stand out. Of course recruiters shouldn't move on with or make initial contact with folks that aren't good candidate.
That's not really what I'm working against though.
If someone applies to a role via a portal or something and the company doesn't respond, that's not ghosting (or, rather, that's not the ghosting I'm talking about). Maybe I should make that clear in the original post - I'll do that. This is more tackling the case where there's been some communication between you and the recruiter, and then they just drop it. That's the rude case I'm focusing on.
In both the recruiter case and the dating case, the recruiter is perfectly in the right to want to move on at any point. But a quick 5 work message or email vs ghosting makes a big difference for the recipient, I'd think. Even outside of being less rude, it makes things easier because you know which doors are actually still open or not.
For the record, I already do what you're saying, and it is good advice in general. I have dozens of calls with people inside companies I'm looking to work at and look for internal roles. How well that works though depends on a number of things even outside of how qualified you are.