|
|
|
|
|
by foxyv
655 days ago
|
|
> You're less than half as likely to get in as a man. This is a bit of a misunderstanding of how statistics works. This does not reflect your personal chances of being accepted, only the chances of the subset of men who applied. You are assuming that all the men were equally qualified as the women and there were no other distinguishing characteristics between the two groups. For instance, if there is a pre-selection process for one group that there was not for another it could skew the numbers significantly and make one group much smaller with a higher acceptance rate. While the percentage differences could indicate bias against men, it could also indicate something else. |
|