[chii]

if you can guarantee that layouts don't change during interactions, i guess it _might_ save some time for the browser (and thus battery, for low power devices).

If layouts change during interaction (e.g., orientation swap), then you will have a roundtrip to the server to recalculate. I assume this would cost more time than letting the browser css engine do their thing.

[agentcooper]

In my comment I assumed that Clay layout is running in the browser as well, but your idea of running it before serving the HTML is quite interesting!

[chii]

I wonder if this would be more efficient than the browser's impl. But i guess if clay does less complex layouts (but which is still sufficient for applications) than css, it might be faster than the browser's own.

Very curious train of thought.

[codr7]

Very interesting indeed, score one more for server side generation.