[subsubzero]

Agree, Zuck has zero integrity and I think he sees the tea leaves in where things are headed in November and is trying to say he was bullied into making alot of disastrous decisions that he and he only ordered for an administration/party that he personally donated $400M+ to.

[PierceJoy]

He donated 400m to funding election infrastructure. How is that donating to Democrats?

[nostromo]

There are concerns that they paid for infrastructure in deeply democratic areas and ignored areas that were republican-leaning, in effect making it a Democratic get out the vote initiative.

The media doesn't seem too interested in figuring out the actual impact, so I don't think any of us really know if it was balanced or not. But this doesn't strike me as the type of thing we want billionaires doing regardless.

[archagon]

Where are you sourcing this from? Personally, I’ve only heard of the opposite happening. (For example, polling places getting shut down in some majority black areas in Georgia.)

[PierceJoy]

> There are concerns that they paid for infrastructure in deeply democratic areas and ignored areas that were republican-leaning

Concerns without evidence are nothing. Is there any evidence at all this occurred? Why aren't Republicans attacking Musk donating 10's of millions of dollars to directly help Trump?

I mean, we know why they aren't attacking him. Because they're complete hypocrites.

[somewhat_drunk]

"There are concerns"

Can you link to something describing the basis for these concerns?

[amy-petrik-214]

the party that controls election infrastructure is the kingmaker thusly, if one observes the king that was made, one knows the party who decided see: GW Bush victory in FL see: Biden victory in >100% vote cities

[PierceJoy]

Then how did Biden win in places where Republicans controlled the election infrastructure?

[warkdarrior]

That's where the Jewish lasers from space come in..

[somewhat_drunk]

>he sees the tea leaves in where things are headed in November

Things are headed strongly in the opposite direction you're implying.

[throwaway48476]

Definitely. The letter only mentions Biden who is a lame duck and now safe to criticize.