|
|
|
|
|
by geod_of_ix
662 days ago
|
|
Where to even begin.
1. Temperature - The higher the temperature difference, the faster the loss of heat. How will the steam maintain it's energy (temp) in that long pipe.
2. Drilling each borehole is no small feat, and uses lots of energy and materials, all of which have associated embodied energy costs. Is is really worth it once all that work is done?
3. Geothermal. Interesting analogy, why not just use that instead. Boom, no additional radioactivity required.
This whole things sounds very Rube Goldberg machine like. |
|
2. The idea is to use the earth as a substitute for the containment building, so as long as the cost of drilling are less than those costs, it would be a net.
3. Geothermal is not readily available at shallow depths everywhere. The deeper you go, the higher the costs. Also with some types of geothermal you run the risk of earthquakes, as they use the same process as fracking to develop the wells.