|
|
|
|
|
by singron
654 days ago
|
|
Otel works as a standard since there isn't any need to innovate at that level. Despite the over complications it has, all the implementations largely have the same requirements, and it's useful to instrument everything the same way. Querying unfortunately has lots of room for innovation, and it's really hard to nail down in a spec especially when the vendors all want to compete. |
|
At BigCo we have migrated a number of internal things to Otel but I don’t think it has been worth the effort.
So many projects come with prometheus metrics, dashboards, and alerts out of the box that it becomes hard to use anything else. When I pick some random helm chart to install you can almost guarantee that is comes with prometheus integrations.
With grafana mimir you can now scale easily to a few billion metrics streams so a lot of the issues with the old model of prometheus have been fixed.
Like you said I don’t think there is much to innovate on in this area, which is a good thing.