|
|
|
|
|
by jerrysievert
654 days ago
|
|
the outrage is that the land they are giving to the (foreign) golf club owners is specifically state-managed conservation land that was not properly vetted according to law, and in return they are receiving land that does not meet the same criteria: > The land the company is offering in return is isolated from other conservation land, not on the state’s land acquisition wish list and not part of a wildlife corridor. there is plenty of true and correct outrage. |
|