|
|
|
|
|
|
by mnau
667 days ago
|
|
|
Your license badge shows AGPL 1.0, but the license file GPL 3.0. I would suggest a commercial option in addition to GPL, otherwise it is going to have a very limited reach. Or possibly switch to LGPL (depending on your intentions), but this decision need to be done before you take other any contribution (or add a requirement to sign CLA to PR checklist). |
|
|
I'm glad to see your interest in my project. Your point about the mismatch between the license badge and the file is indeed important. To avoid confusion, I'll make sure to correct that immediately.
I also appreciate your suggestion regarding the addition of a commercial license and switching to LGPL. In fact, I plan to switch from GPL to LGPL to broaden the project's usability. As for the commercial license option, it is still under consideration, but I'm positively thinking about it as a future possibility for the project.
Additionally, I am considering the introduction of a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) to foster deeper collaboration with contributors.
Your continued feedback and suggestions are highly valued. Thank you for your support, and I look forward to hearing more from you in the future.