|
> Remembered this article... https://drewdevault.com/2019/03/25/Rust-is-not-a-good-C-repl... Remembering Drew Devault is the Fox News of programming bloggers. He exhibits the same sort of bad faith obtuseness, and knee-jerk neck beard tech conservatism, that makes me/many want to scream. First, his thesis is risible. "Rust is not a good C replacement". Note, Drew does not mean replace C code with Rust code, but Rust, the language, literally replacing C, the language. Ignoring, perhaps, Rust doesn't want to "replace" C, because we have C! Next, see the bulleted text. Upon each topic something interesting might be said re: Rust, but instead they all serve a garbage thesis that Rust can never be the 50 year old language that the tech world is currently built upon. Well, duh. My least favorite, though, is the final bullet: > Safety. Yes, Rust is more safe. I don’t really care. In light of all of these problems, I’ll take my segfaults and buffer overflows. And everyone wants to be a cowboy and watch things blow up when they are 8 years old. |