|
|
|
|
|
by defensive7132
660 days ago
|
|
"risk of a wind turbine is, and always was, zero" seems like you need to check on how many people die a year while maintaining wind turbines. Fukushima accident: corruption Chernobyl: incompetence Three mile island accident: that's a bit more nuanced than just human error, but nothing we haven't fixed already SL-1: suicide-murder/human error Those are the serious accidents. As you may see, all are perfectly fixable. Plus, current nuclear plants are more advanced. Now while you have on your mind these 4 accidents, consider that currently there are 403 in use plants and oldest one is over 60 years. All working with no issue. |
|
For solar and wind the general public generally can’t be affected by any accidents so the deaths are general work place hazards coming from working aloft with heavy equipment.
For nuclear power the public is on the hook for cleanup fees from hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars and the large scale accidents we have seen caused hundreds of thousands to get evacuated.
It is not even comparable. If I chose to not work in the solar and wind industry my chance of harm is as near zero as it gets. Meanwhile about all consequences from nuclear power afflicts the general public. Both in terms of costs, injuries and life changing evacuations.