|
|
|
|
|
by specialist
661 days ago
|
|
IIRC, SCOTUS recently ruled that only an explicit quid pro quo is considered a bribe. So laundering monies thru multiple parties is a-okay and mutual backscratching, such as a gifting someone an RV and then coincidentally getting preferential lucrative judgements, is reciprocal altruism. Or something. Because vibes. I know, I know. Requiring conspirators to say "this is a bribe" for there to be legal jeopardy is sort of nuts. |
|